If enacted, SB3176 will amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to introduce a new chapter focused on pay disparity. Applicable employers—defined as those with more than $100 million in gross receipts and exceeding $10 million in wages—would be required to calculate a 'pay disparity factor' based on the ratio of the highest-paid employee's average wages to the median wages paid to all employees. The tax thus levied would be contingent on this ratio, essentially creating a disincentive for excessive executive compensation relative to median worker pay. The intent behind this change is to encourage corporations to reassess their pay structures and move towards equitable compensation practices.
Summary
SB3176, also known as the Curtailing Executive Overcompensation (CEO) Act, proposes an excise tax targeting employers who exhibit excessively disparate wages between their highest-paid executives and the median employee compensation. The main objective of this legislation is to address income inequality and its broader societal impacts by penalizing excessive compensation packages offered to CEOs while ensuring that lower-wage earners receive fair compensation. This bill aims to create a more equitable wage distribution within corporations by imposing fiscal consequences on those that maintain a significant wage gap.
Contention
The bill's provisions have sparked a debate among lawmakers and stakeholders about its potential effectiveness and feasibility. Supporters argue that imposing a tax on excessive CEO pay will help combat income inequality by encouraging companies to align executive compensation with the wages of average workers. However, critics raise concerns about the bill's implementation, specifically the challenges in accurately measuring pay disparity and the potential for unintended consequences—such as companies opting out of the workforce or relocating to avoid the tax. The debate reflects broader discussions on corporate ethics, shareholder value, and workers’ rights in the age of economic disparity.
Restaurant Revitalization Tax Credit Act This bill allows certain restaurants affected by the COVID-19 pandemic a credit against payroll tax liability up to 100% of the wages paid to their employees, not to exceed $25,000 in any calendar quarter.
Personal income tax: voluntary contributions: California Breast Cancer Research Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund and California Cancer Research Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.
Juveniles: other; default maximum time for a juvenile to complete the terms of a consent calendar case plan; increase to 6 months. Amends sec. 2f, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.2f).
Courts: family division; use of screening tool for minors sought to be placed on the consent calendar; require. Amends sec. 2f, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.2f). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0418'23