Us Congress House Bill HJR98

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/9/23
• Report Pass: 12/12/23
• Engrossed: 1/16/24
• Enrolled: 5/1/24
• Vetoed: 5/3/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to "Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status".

Impact

If enacted, HJR98 would effectively eliminate the NLRB's established standards regarding joint employer status, which may have significant implications for how companies operate. The resolution targets recent interpretations that could expand employer obligations and liabilities, particularly concerning subcontracting and franchising arrangements. By disapproving these rules, Congress could influence how employers classify their relationships with workers and other companies, potentially reducing the scope of joint employer liability. This change could encourage more conservative interpretations of employment relationships, impacting a variety of industries reliant on flexible labor arrangements.

Summary

HJR98 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a specific rule proposed by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning the standards for determining joint employer status. The resolution expresses congressional disagreement with the NLRB's rule, which was published in the Federal Register, effectively nullifying its legal standing. The bill reflects a legislative response to concerns regarding the implications of the NLRB's rule on labor relations, particularly in terms of employer liability and the complexities of defining joint employment. By passing HJR98, Congress seeks to assert its authority over labor regulations and clarify standards that affect employment practices across the country.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR98 is divided, with strong support from conservative lawmakers and business interests advocating for reduced regulatory burdens on employers. Proponents argue that the NLRB's rule imposes unnecessary complexities that could hinder business operations and economic growth. Conversely, opponents express concern that disapproving the rule could undermine worker protections and limit accountability for companies that share control over employees, particularly in labor-intensive sectors. This highlights a significant ideological conflict between regulatory oversight and business interests, revealing deep divides in attitudes toward labor rights and employer responsibilities.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HJR98 involve the balance of power between state and federal regulation of labor laws, as well as the interpretation of what constitutes as joint employment. Critics argue that the resolution could weaken protections for workers in precarious employment situations, while supporters contend that it restores clarity and fairness for employers. Furthermore, the resolution's passage reflects broader themes within the ongoing national dialogue over labor rights, employer-employee dynamics, and the extent of regulatory authority, making it a pivotal issue in the current legislative landscape.