Us Congress House Bill HB7341

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Report Pass: 2/15/24

Caption

To make technical amendments to title 49, United States Code, as necessary to improve the Code.

Impact

The enactment of HB7341 is expected to positively influence federal regulatory frameworks by enhancing interpretability and reducing the potential for misinterpretation of statutory provisions. This is important for stakeholders in the transportation sector, including government entities and private sector firms that rely on federal loans and guarantees. By ensuring consistency in language and structure, the bill aims to facilitate a more efficient regulatory environment, potentially spurring economic growth and making funding processes smoother for relevant parties.

Summary

House Bill 7341 seeks to make technical amendments to Title 49 of the United States Code, aimed at improving clarity and consistency within the statutory framework governing transportation regulations. The bill addresses various sections of Title 49 and proposes modifications that are primarily technical in nature, ensuring that the language and requirements are up-to-date and straightforward. This procedural cleaning helps streamline processes associated with transportation, whether it be direct loans, loan guarantees, or other financing mechanisms under federal regulations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB7341 appears to be supportive among legislative members focusing on regulatory improvement. While technical amendments may not draw widespread public attention, the consensus among supporters is that the bill contributes to the effective functioning of the regulatory environment. Such support from members indicates a recognition of the importance of maintaining well-structured laws to ensure coherent governance of transportation-related issues.

Contention

Although no significant points of contention were noted in available discussions, as technical amendments often do not elicit intense debates, any objections typically arise over specific wording or implications of certain definitions. Stakeholders may express concern regarding how changes could influence funding eligibility or regulatory burdens, but these are minor compared to broader legislative debates. It’s crucial for legislative reviews to ensure that these amendments do not inadvertently alter substantive policy outcomes.