If passed, HB 7452 would significantly amend current state laws governing telecommunications. It would empower local authorities to create agreements with vendors for the provision of telecommunications services, thereby bypassing some of the restrictions imposed by current state regulations. This change is seen as crucial for fostering competitive environments in areas where service is limited, ultimately aiming to stimulate economic growth and better connectivity across the state.
Summary
House Bill 7452, known as the Local Telecom Expansion Act of 2024, seeks to enhance telecommunications infrastructure across the state. The bill's primary objective is to facilitate the expansion of internet and telecommunications services, particularly in underserved and rural areas. By providing local governments with the necessary tools and authority to partner with private companies, the bill aims to improve access to high-speed broadband and ensure that residents in all regions benefit from modern telecommunications services.
Contention
While the bill has garnered support from many legislators and community advocates who recognize the importance of broadband access, there are points of contention among stakeholders. Critics argue that the measure may lead to an uneven distribution of resources, where certain areas may receive preferential treatment based on local politics rather than genuine need. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the potential financial implications for local governments, which may struggle to fund such expansions without adequate state support. The debate also includes discussions about the balance of power between state authority and local governance regarding infrastructural decisions.
Barriers and Regulatory Obstacles Avoids Deployment of Broadband Access and Needs Deregulatory Leadership Act or the BROADBAND Leadership ActThis bill limits the authority of a state or locality to regulate the placement, construction, or modification of telecommunications service facilities.States and localities may not discriminate in such regulations among providers of telecommunications services, including based on the technology used to provide services. In addition, states and localities may not regulate in a manner that effectively prohibits the provision or improvement of interstate or intrastate telecommunications services.However, states and localities may charge reasonable, cost-based fees (1) to review requests to place, construct, or modify telecommunications service facilities; or (2) for the use of property owned or managed by the state or locality for the placement, construction, or modification of those facilities.States or localities must respond to requests to place, construct, or modify facilities and for other related actions by specified deadlines. Such deadlines may only be tolled by a mutual agreement between the applicant and the state or locality, or in the event that the application is incomplete and requires a supplemental submission. If a decision is not made by the deadline, the request is deemed to be approved. Further, denials of requests must be made in writing, supported by evidence, and promptly released to the public.A person adversely affected by an alleged violation of these provisions may petition the courts for expedited review of the actions of the state or locality.
Establishes office in EDA to assist in provision and expansion of broadband Internet service in State to address inequities in accessing broadband service.
Establishes office in EDA to assist in provision and expansion of broadband Internet service in State to address inequities in accessing broadband service.
Establishes office in EDA to assist in provision and expansion of broadband Internet service in State to address inequities in accessing broadband service.
Establishes office in EDA to assist in provision and expansion of broadband Internet service in State to address inequities in accessing broadband service.