Us Congress Senate Bill SR569

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/29/24
• Refer: 2/29/24

Caption

A resolution recognizing religious freedom as a fundamental right, expressing support for international religious freedom as a cornerstone of United States foreign policy, and expressing concern over increased threats to and attacks on religious freedom around the world.

Impact

If passed, SR569 would mandate the U.S. Department of State to maintain and expand support for human rights activists and civil society leaders who are working toward greater religious freedom. It would also require the government to leverage diplomatic tools to hold violators accountable. The resolution aims to heighten awareness of countries that engage in severe violations of religious freedoms and emphasizes the significance of incorporating human rights considerations into U.S. foreign policy decisions, including trade agreements.

Summary

SR569 recognizes religious freedom as a fundamental right and expresses support for international religious freedom as a cornerstone of United States foreign policy. The resolution highlights the critical importance of religious freedom for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law globally. It acknowledges the rising threats to religious freedom, noting numerous incidents of harassment and violence against individuals for their beliefs across various countries. The bill underscores the need for continued engagement by the U.S. government in promoting and protecting religious freedoms worldwide.

Contention

Notably, the bill addresses critical issues such as the criminalization of blasphemy and the persecution of religious minorities in specific countries, including China, Burma, and Iran. By supporting this resolution, the Senate expresses grave concern over the worsening conditions for religious minorities internationally, which could impact U.S. relationships with these nations. The bill's supporters argue it is a necessary step to uplift human rights standards globally, while critics may raise concerns about the implications for U.S. diplomatic relations and the complexity of enforcing these human rights protections.