California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1610

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
7/5/23  
Report Pass
7/5/23  
Refer
7/5/23  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/24/24  
Report Pass
6/24/24  
Refer
6/24/24  
Refer
6/24/24  

Caption

Cannabis: Department of Cannabis Control.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1610 would significantly enhance the responsibilities and operational standards of the Department of Cannabis Control. It mandates that the department maintain a record of all recall orders and requires licensed testing laboratories to undergo strict proficiency testing and regular audits. This ensures that the cannabis products available on the market are consistently tested for quality and safety, addressing concerns related to contaminants and misbranding. The bill also empowers the department to immediately act on product recalls that pose a serious threat to public health.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1610, introduced by Assembly Member Jones-Sawyer, aims to amend the Business and Professions Code relating to cannabis by strengthening the regulatory framework established under the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) and the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA). Key provisions include the establishment of quality assurance standards for cannabis products, mandatory recall procedures, and biennial audits for testing laboratories. The bill emphasizes the need for consistent testing and safety protocols to ensure consumer protection and product integrity.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding AB 1610 appears to be supportive among regulatory bodies and advocates for consumer safety. Proponents argue that the increased standards for quality assurance and the establishment of clear protocols for testing and recalls are necessary in a burgeoning cannabis market. However, some stakeholders express concern about potential burdens on smaller operators who may find compliance more challenging, indicating a mixed reception from those engaged in the cannabis industry.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential economic impact on smaller cannabis businesses and microbusinesses due to the increased regulatory requirements outlined in the bill. While the intent is to protect consumers and ensure high standards, industry representatives worry that stringent testing and compliance measures could lead to higher operational costs and reduced competition. This ongoing debate highlights the need to balance consumer safety with the economic realities of the cannabis industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1527

Cannabis: Cannabis Control Appeals Panel.

CA AB545

Cannabis: Bureau of Cannabis Control.

CA AB1111

Cannabis: small producer event sales license.

CA AB3054

Cannabis: appointees: prohibited activities.

CA AB686

Cannabis: appointees: prohibited activities.

CA AB8

Cannabis: cannabinoids: industrial hemp.

CA AB141

Budget Act of 2021: Department of Cannabis Control: licensure: safety and quality assurance.

CA AB1872

Cannabis.

CA AB1159

Cannabis: legal services.

CA AB2721

Cannabis Control Appeals Panel: membership.

Similar Bills

CA AB1027

Cannabis: testing: quality assurance.

CA AB2749

Cannabis: quality assurance and testing.

CA SB544

Cannabis testing.

CA AB623

Cannabis: THC testing variances.

CA AB1458

Cannabis testing laboratories.

CA AB1470

Cannabis testing.

CA AB290

Cannabis testing.

CA SB829

Cannabis: donations.