Us Congress House Bill HJR159

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/24
• Refer: 5/23/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants".

Impact

If passed, HJR159 would effectively nullify the FWS's rule, thereby preventing the enforcement of the regulations it encompasses. This could have significant repercussions for wildlife conservation efforts, potentially leading to less protective measures for endangered species. Proponents of the resolution argue that the current FWS regulations may overreach or impose undue burdens on local stakeholders, while opponents contend that retracting these regulations could jeopardize the survival of vulnerable species. The debate encapsulates a broader ideological division on environmental management and federal oversight.

Summary

HJR159 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) concerning regulations on endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. The resolution cites concerns regarding the effectiveness and implications of these regulations, indicating that Congress seeks to exercise its authority to annul this specific rule under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code. The resolution signifies a move by certain Congressional members to reassert legislative control over environmental regulation, particularly in the realm of wildlife conservation, which has historically been a contentious area of governance.

Contention

The discussions surrounding HJR159 reflect a growing tension between conservation efforts and economic or developmental interests. Supporters of the resolution include members who argue that the federal government's approach to wildlife regulations can hinder local economic development and land use practices. Critics, however, warn that rolling back regulations could lead to increased extinction rates and loss of biodiversity. This conflict underscores the ongoing struggle within Congress over balancing ecological preservation with economic interests, a theme that continues to resonate within environmental and legislative dialogues.