The bill aims to bolster national security by ensuring that critical infrastructure can continue functioning even when digital systems are compromised. The assessment will not only evaluate the existing capabilities of infrastructure owners and operators but also recommend necessary policy adjustments to facilitate manual operations. Moreover, updated planning considerations will provide best practices for essential personnel to ensure mission-critical functions are maintained, reinforcing the resilience of public services during cyber crises.
Summary
House Bill 8775, titled the 'Contingency Plan for Critical Infrastructure Act,' mandates an assessment on the ability of critical infrastructure to operate manually during cyber incidents. The Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), along with FEMA and other relevant agencies, is required to provide Congress with a sector-by-sector evaluation within 180 days of the bill's enactment. This assessment will delve into the risks associated with transitioning to manual operations during cyber attacks and the preparedness of current emergency frameworks in dealing with such incidents.
Contention
Discussions surrounding HB 8775 likely involve debates on the balance between security and operational autonomy for infrastructure operators. Key points of contention may arise concerning the financial implications for infrastructure sectors required to implement such manual capabilities, and whether the training and resources for these requirements will be adequately funded. Moreover, while supporters argue that increased preparedness is essential for national security, opponents may question if imposing stringent operational standards could hinder flexibility and innovation within the infrastructure sectors.