SEAS Act of 2024 Securing Enforcement in African Seas Act of 2024
The SEAS Act is anticipated to directly affect U.S. foreign policy by establishing a framework for increased interagency cooperation in preventing IUU fishing and associated labor abuses. It mandates that relevant U.S. agencies, including the Coast Guard and the Department of State, enhance their presence and capabilities in 'Coast Guard Priority Countries' identified as facing significant challenges related to IUU fishing. This includes a requirement for feasibility studies, strategic planning, and the development of maritime domain awareness capabilities in the partner nations. Such measures are intended to build the capacity of these countries to effectively manage their exclusive economic zones and law enforcement activities comprehensively.
House Bill 9440, known as the Securing Enforcement in African Seas Act of 2024 (SEAS Act), aims to enhance the United States' strategies in cooperation with African countries to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. The bill highlights the severe impact of IUU fishing on the economic stability and food security of coastal African nations, estimating that such practices lead to annual economic losses of approximately $11.5 billion. A significant concern is the involvement of large fleets, particularly those from the People's Republic of China, which dominate the IUU fishing activities off Africa's coast. The bill thus underscores the need for a coordinated response from the U.S. and its partners to enforce sustainable fishing practices and uphold maritime laws.
Critics of the SEAS Act may argue that while the intentions behind enhancing cooperation with African nations are commendable, the operational specifics—such as the selection process for Coast Guard personnel and the prioritization of certain countries—could lead to inefficiencies or competition among agencies. Furthermore, there may be concerns about ensuring that local needs are adequately addressed, and the effectiveness of proposed measures in the absence of solid commitments from the countries involved. It raises questions regarding the potential implications of U.S. influence in regional fishing governance and local sovereignty.