Raising concern about the proposed constitutional reforms in Mexico.
Impact
The resolution emphasizes that these proposed changes could have long-term negative impacts not only on Mexico’s internal governance but also on bilateral relations with the United States. The possibility of undermining democratic safeguards presents risks to security and stability in the region. Given the deep economic ties between the two nations, any deterioration in Mexico’s institutional integrity could also jeopardize mutual interests, such as trade and cross-border cooperation on issues like organized crime and drug trafficking.
Summary
House Resolution 1435 raises concerns regarding the proposed constitutional reforms in Mexico, particularly those affecting the judiciary. The resolution highlights the implications of these reforms, which, if enacted, would alter the structure of the Mexican judiciary, including direct elections of Federal judges and the elimination of independent oversight. This shift could potentially undermine the separation of powers and judicial independence in Mexico, raising alarms about the overall stability of its democratic institutions.
Contention
There is significant contention surrounding the proposed reforms, as evidenced by the widespread strike initiated by Mexican Federal judges and vocal opposition from various organizations, including judicial associations and business groups. Critics argue that these reforms would compromise vital aspects of governance, such as judicial independence and electoral integrity, which are critical for maintaining public trust and effective administration. The resolution serves not only as a formal expression of concern but also as a call to protect democratic values and human rights in Mexico.
Reaffirming the United States commitment to respecting the sovereignty of Mexico and condemning calls for military action in Mexico without Mexico's consent and congressional authorization.
Calling for comprehensive legislation that addresses United States policies contributing to forced migration and displacement, promotes an immigration system that addresses the root causes of migration, reaffirms United States commitment to asylum, and provides a roadmap to citizenship for immigrants living in the United States.
This concurrent resolution states that, unless it is approved by Congress, the proposed joint interpretation of Annex 14-C of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) prepared by Ambassador Katherine Tai (1) is of no legal effect with respect to the United States or any U.S. person, and (2) cannot be invoked by any federal agency in any legal proceeding nor may a federal agency assert that it has any legal consequences for claims made by a U.S. person. (Annex 14-C of the USMCA concerns certain investment claims under the North American Free Trade Agreement, the agreement which preceded USMCA.)
Recognizing and supporting the efforts of the New Heights Bid Committee to bring the 2027 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) Women's World Cup competition to the United States and Mexico.
Calling for the annulment of the Monroe Doctrine and the development of a "New Good Neighbor" policy in order to foster improved relations and deeper, more effective cooperation between the United States and our Latin American and Caribbean neighbors.