Us Congress House Bill HB9927

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/4/24
• Refer: 10/4/24

Caption

To terminate the Shelter and Services Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and for other purposes.

Impact

The cessation of funding for the Shelter and Services Program will necessitate a reassessment of how communities and states provide emergency services and shelter in disaster scenarios. Transferring the unobligated balances to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief Act indicates that funds from this source would be redirected; however, the specific implications of this transition remain to be seen. This decision could alter the landscape of disaster management, potentially leading to an increased reliance on state and local programs to fill the gap left by FEMA's absence in this area.

Summary

House Bill 9927 seeks to terminate the Shelter and Services Program within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The bill proposes that no federal funds will be appropriated to this program starting from the date of its enactment, signaling a shift in how disaster relief services might be funded and administered. Currently, the Shelter and Services Program provides necessary support for individuals in need of temporary shelter and assistance, particularly during emergencies and disasters. The termination of this funding could leave a significant gap in available resources for vulnerable populations during crises.

Contention

The bill is not without controversy. Critics may argue that terminating the Shelter and Services Program could adversely affect the most vulnerable populations during disasters—individuals and families who rely on federal assistance for basic needs such as shelter, food, and other critical services. The debate surrounding this bill may center on issues of government responsibility and the adequacy of state responses to disasters if federal support is eliminated. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the efficacy and prioritization of funds being shifted to other programs within the FEMA framework.

Notable_points

The bill reflects ongoing tensions in U.S. disaster management policy, particularly in balancing federal and state responsibilities. Supporters may argue for the need to streamline services and eliminate what they perceive as redundant federal programs. However, the potential repercussions for individuals relying on these services will likely fuel arguments against the bill, making this a significant point of debate in upcoming discussions.