Mississippi Senate Bill SB2510

Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22
• Failed: 2/1/22

Caption

Commission on Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks; convert into advisory commission.

Impact

The proposed amendments will impact various statutory regulations surrounding wildlife and fisheries management in Mississippi, specifically redefining the role and powers of the advisory commission. The legislation is expected to streamline decision-making by consolidating powers and providing clearer operational directives through the executive department. This shift could potentially enhance operational efficiency in managing wildlife resources but may also raise concerns about reduced oversight and input from the advisory commission, traditionally representing diverse stakeholder interests in wildlife management.

Summary

Senate Bill 2510 aims to amend multiple sections of the Mississippi Code related to the wildlife and fisheries management framework. It primarily focuses on redefining the Mississippi Advisory Commission on Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks to serve strictly as an advisory body to the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks. This reconstitution means that the commission will no longer have legislative or regulatory powers, shifting the decision-making authority further in the executive direction of the department under the guidance of the governor. The executive director will now serve at the governor's pleasure, solidifying executive control over the department's operations.

Contention

While the bill is positioned as a necessary update to improve efficiency in wildlife management, concerns have been voiced regarding the trade-off between operational efficiency and the oversight role of the advisory commission. Critics argue that restricting the commission's role could diminish local input and representation in the management of wildlife resources, particularly in areas significant to local communities and environmental advocates. Furthermore, the focus on consolidating power could lead to criticisms about lack of transparency and accountability in decisions affecting wildlife and fisheries management.