Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB905

Introduced

1/17/22

Refer

1/17/22

Failed

2/1/22

Caption

Statues and monuments; prohibit removal of certain unless authorized by an act of the Legislature.

Impact

The implications of HB 905 extend to how public entities manage historical sites and monuments. By mandating legislative authorization for relocations or alterations, the bill effectively centralizes decision-making authority at the state level, limiting local governments' ability to act independently regarding their historical items. It aims to prevent changes that may be influenced by contemporary societal shifts or sentiments, thus promoting a traditionalist stance toward historical preservation. This could have a chilling effect on community initiatives aimed at addressing historical narratives that conflict with public sentiments today.

Summary

House Bill 905 amends Section 55-15-81 of the Mississippi Code of 1972 to establish strict regulations against the relocation or alteration of certain historical items, structures, and areas within the state. The bill specifies that these actions can only be undertaken if explicitly authorized through legislation, thereby requiring legislative approval for any such changes. The scope includes monuments, memorials, streets, and other dedicated public properties tied to historical significance, including military and civil rights contexts. This measure adds a layer of protection to these items in an attempt to preserve Mississippi's historical narrative.

Contention

Notably, the bill faces criticism from various advocacy groups and local officials who argue that it undermines local autonomy and the ability of communities to make decisions regarding their own historical representations. Critics suggest that the rigid framework could hinder important discussions and reconciliations related to historical injustices, particularly those tied to civil rights. The bill attempts to prevent the removal of potentially controversial monuments, which may inhibit efforts to address past wrongs actively. The clash of perspectives indicates a divisive atmosphere around the issue of how history is represented in public spaces.