Mississippi House Bill JR202

Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/28/22
• Refer: 3/28/22
• Engrossed: 3/29/22
• Refer: 3/31/22
• Enrolled: 3/31/22
• Passed: 3/31/22

Caption

Mississippi Senate; reapportion.

Impact

The impact of JR202 on state laws is significant, as it directly reshapes the electoral map for state Senate elections. By creating districts that are as close to equal in population as practicable, it aims to enhance fair representation and accommodate demographic shifts that have occurred since the last apportionment. This amendment to the existing law corresponds with constitutional requirements and ensures that representation is properly aligned with population changes observed during census counts. Moreover, it reinforces the state's commitment to equity and justice in voter representation.

Summary

Joint Resolution 202 (JR202) seeks to reapportion the Senate of Mississippi in accordance with Section 254 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890. This resolution is enacted every ten years to ensure compliance with the 'one-person, one-vote' requirement mandated by federal law. The new districts, outlined in the resolution, are intended to reflect population changes and will be applied to elections held in 2023 for the 2024 legislative session and beyond. JR202 maintains that the Senate will consist of 52 members elected from single-member districts throughout the state, each composed of carefully defined precincts to ensure proper representation.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding JR202 reflects a generally supportive sentiment from legislators who emphasize the importance of fair and equal voter representation. Proponents assert that the reapportionment is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the electoral process in Mississippi. However, there could be contention around the actual boundaries drawn for these new districts. Some community leaders and opposition groups may express concern regarding how the redistricting process could marginalize communities or create districts that do not accurately represent the electorate’s interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential claims that district boundaries could favor certain political parties or demographics, thus undermining the goal of equitable representation. There is a concern that splitting precincts or creating highly gerrymandered districts could dilute the voting power of specific communities. Furthermore, as JR202 explicitly states that any prior redistricting will be null and void once this resolution is adopted, any disputes regarding underrepresented groups or contested boundaries may escalate as the resolution is implemented.