The "Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Rights and Authorities Act"; create.
The passage of HB839 is notable for its provisions that allow for recreational use of UAS without the requirement for state-level registration or additional local regulations beyond those dictated by federal law. It reinforces that operating uncrewed aircraft for recreational use is permitted as long as the operator adheres to federal guidelines. This law may significantly reduce barriers for drone enthusiasts and commercial operators, fostering economic activity in related fields such as delivery services, agriculture, and surveillance.
House Bill 839, titled the "Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Rights and Authorities Act," seeks to establish clear guidelines for the operation of uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS), commonly referred to as drones, within the state of Mississippi. The bill emphasizes that individuals and business entities can operate UAS for both recreational and commercial purposes, provided they comply with federal laws. A significant aspect of this legislation is its intention to formalize the legality of UAS operations while ensuring alignment with existing federal regulations on airspace usage.
However, the bill is not without its controversies. It includes provisions that prevent local governments from enacting regulations specifically related to drone operations, thereby centralizing regulatory authority at the state level. Critics might argue that this approach undermines local governance and the ability of municipalities to address concerns unique to their communities, particularly regarding privacy and safety in the usage of drones. Moreover, while the bill permits local jurisdictions to enact ordinances related to general safety and nuisance issues, it restricts their ability to impose specific operational standards for UAS, which could lead to a lack of tailored public safety measures.
HB839 also clarifies that the operation of UAS in airspace over Mississippi does not lead to legal liability for the operators, which may alleviate concerns stemming from potential lawsuits. Nevertheless, it leaves room for legal action regarding privacy violations that may occur via drone usage. The balancing act between encouraging drone technology's growth and ensuring the protection of citizens' rights will be a key consideration as the bill moves forward.