Mississippi House Bill HB862

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Failed: 1/31/23

Caption

Contract lobbyists; prohibit agencies, universities and colleges from hiring with public funds.

Impact

If enacted, this legislation would significantly alter the financial landscape around how public entities in Mississippi engage with lobbying. State agencies will need to rely on internal resources for advocacy efforts, as the bill prohibits the hiring of external lobbyists at public expense. It aims to ensure that public funds are utilized solely for essential services rather than for influencing legislature decisions through paid lobbying activities. This shift has the potential to streamline resource allocation within state agencies and community colleges, directing funds toward direct educational and administrative needs.

Summary

House Bill 862 aims to codify new regulations under Section 5-8-27 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, specifically targeting the expenditure of public funds by state agencies and community colleges for the purpose of hiring contract lobbyists. The bill explicitly prohibits state agencies and junior colleges from spending public money to pay for lobbying services, declaring any contracts associated with such expenditures as void and unenforceable. The underlying principle of the bill is to reduce the financial burden on state resources by eliminating expenditures on external lobbying efforts.

Contention

The passage of HB862 could spark intense debate regarding the implications for transparency and public engagement in legislative processes. Proponents may argue that restricting the use of public funds for lobbying will enhance government accountability and reduce unnecessary spending. Conversely, opponents could raise concerns that this effectively limits the ability of smaller agencies and junior colleges to advocate for their needs, potentially stifling their voices in the legislative arena. The bill includes provisions for potential termination of state employees found in violation of this new rule, raising concerns about job security and the implications for agency advocacy roles.