Mississippi House Bill HB1185

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Failed: 1/31/23

Caption

ARPA Rural Water Associations Infrastructure Grant Program; clarify that certain entities are eligible to participate in.

Impact

The bill asserts significant implications on state laws by reinforcing the eligibility of various entities to access grants meant for critical infrastructure upgrades. Such provision enables increased funding opportunities for diverse organizations involved in water supply services, thus ensuring better access to safe drinking water. With up to $2.5 million available for each grant, this financial support aims to address not only compliance with state and federal regulations but also promote economic development in underserved regions. The legislative intent emphasizes the necessity to commit twenty percent of appropriated funds to projects prepared for immediate construction, enhancing project efficiency.

Summary

House Bill 1185 seeks to amend Section 41-3-16.1 of the Mississippi Code of 1972 to expand the eligibility criteria for participation in the ARPA Rural Water Associations Infrastructure Grant Program. This program, established by the State Department of Health, is designed to provide grants to rural water associations to facilitate infrastructure improvements for eligible drinking water projects. The new amendments clarify that any entity operating as a rural water association, regardless of its organizational status, qualifies for assistance. By broadening the scope, the bill aims to enhance the reach of the program and improve drinking water infrastructure in rural areas.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 1185 positions itself as a reformative effort to optimize the utilization of ARPA funds for rural water associations in Mississippi. By clarifying eligibility and facilitating a streamlined grant application process, the bill aims to foster improved drinking water infrastructure while ensuring a thorough vetting process for funding distribution. As discussions on its implications continue, the balance between adequate oversight and effective resource allocation will be an essential aspect of the legislative dialogue.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding HB 1185 may originate from the conditions placed on grant applications and the oversight of fund allocation. The ranking system for application assessment includes criteria such as environmental impact, community service, and financial contributions from applicants. This specificity may prompt discussions regarding the effectiveness and equity of the grant distribution, particularly concerning disadvantaged communities. Furthermore, exemptions from usual procurement regulations might raise concerns about transparency and accountability in fund management.