Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB1166

Introduced

1/16/23

Refer

1/16/23

Failed

1/31/23

Caption

Sales tax; bring forward certain sections of law authorizing various exemptions.

Impact

The proposed amendments under HB 1166 would have significant implications for various sectors including healthcare, education, and nonprofit organizations. For example, sales of tangible personal property and services to hospitals, charitable organizations, and educational institutions could be impacted by adjustments in tax exemptions. This could either ease the financial burdens on these entities or require them to reassess their funding and resource allocation in the face of potential tax adjustments. The bill's discussion may lead to broader conversations about how sales tax exemptions support or hinder community services and economic growth.

Summary

House Bill 1166 aims to bring forward Section 27-65-111 of the Mississippi Code, which outlines various sales tax exemptions. The bill's main purpose is to review and potentially amend existing laws regarding exemptions that pertain to sales tax levied on specific goods and services across the state. By bringing this section forward, the legislature intends to assess the appropriateness of these exemptions and their impact on the state's revenue and economic activities. This proactive approach indicates a legislative focus on refining tax policies to ensure they align with current economic needs and social responsibilities.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding HB 1166 involves the balance between maintaining necessary tax revenue for state programs and supporting charitable and essential service providers through tax exemptions. Proponents of the bill may argue that limiting exemptions could bolster state funding for critical services, while opponents may express concerns that such actions threaten the operations of hospitals and nonprofits that rely on these exemptions to serve vulnerable populations. This debate underscores the ongoing tension between state fiscal policy and the need to support community-focused initiatives.