Mississippi Senate Bill SB3101

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Engrossed: 2/22/23
• Refer: 2/23/23
• Failed: 3/14/23

Caption

Mississippi Full Expensing Tax Reform Act of 2023; create.

Impact

The bill is intended to stimulate the state economy by increasing supply chain investments, job creation, and wage growth. It establishes provisions for taxpayers to opt for immediate deduction of expenses related to business improvements, which reflects an adaptation of Mississippi’s tax code to align with federal guidelines. The legislation aims to foster a business-friendly climate that could attract new enterprises and encourage current businesses to expand their operations within the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 3101, titled the 'Mississippi Full Expensing Tax Reform Act of 2023', aims to restructure the state's tax code to incentivize business investments by allowing full and immediate expensing of certain expenses. This includes research and development expenditures as well as expenditures for qualified property or qualified improvement property. By enabling businesses to recover cost immediately rather than over several years, the bill is expected to promote a more competitive business environment and enhance overall economic growth in Mississippi.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB3101 is largely positive among proponents who argue that it will provide significant economic benefits to Mississippi. Supporters see it as a pivotal move towards creating a tax framework that boosts state competitiveness and promotes active investment in the local economy. However, there may be criticism regarding the implications for state revenue and how this could affect long-term fiscal stability.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise from discussions surrounding the scope of the tax deductions and their alignment with sustainable economic practices. There are concerns that while providing tax relief may spur immediate growth, it could also strain state revenues necessary for funding essential services. Ongoing debates might explore the balance between incentivizing business development and ensuring adequate public funding.