Mississippi House Bill HB510

Mississippi 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/24
• Refer: 1/23/24
• Failed: 3/27/24

Caption

Appropriation; State Department of Health to provide epi-pens and AEDs in community colleges, universities and schools.

Impact

The enactment of HB 510 would potentially improve emergency preparedness in schools and campuses by ensuring that life-saving devices are readily available in all educational buildings. By equipping these institutions with epinephrine auto-injectors and AEDs, the bill can significantly lower response times in medical emergencies, which could ultimately save lives. Furthermore, the provision of these medical devices aligns with national trends advocating for increased health resources in schools, addressing both preventative and reactive health needs in educational environments.

Summary

House Bill 510 is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing public health safety measures within educational institutions in Mississippi. The bill appropriates a total of $4,724,819 from the State General Fund for the fiscal year 2025. The funds are designated for the State Department of Health to provide public postsecondary educational institutions and public school districts with essential medical equipment, namely epinephrine auto-injectors and automated external defibrillators (AEDs). These items are crucial for emergency interventions in cases of severe allergic reactions and cardiac arrest, respectively, supporting the health and safety of students and staff.

Contention

While the overall intent of HB 510 appears to be widely supportive, discussions may arise concerning the allocation of funds from the State General Fund. Concerns could be raised about the appropriateness of spending priorities and whether this allocation is adequate to meet the health needs of all public educational institutions. Additionally, debates might surface regarding the maintenance and training associated with the use of AEDs and epinephrine auto-injectors, as simply providing the devices does not guarantee their effective use in emergencies. These aspects could lead to discussions about further legislative measures or funding for training programs that would accompany the distribution of such critical health equipment.