The enactment of HB 839 could significantly streamline the housing development approval process in Hawaii. By allowing HHFDC or eligible developers to bypass certain regulatory hurdles, the bill aims to expedite the development of affordable housing, which is crucial given the ongoing housing crisis in the state. However, local government oversight remains in play, as county legislative bodies are still required to approve projects within a specified time frame. This balance seeks to maintain a semblance of local governance while also addressing the pressing need for more housing.
Summary
House Bill 839 is focused on housing developments within the State of Hawaii. The bill outlines a framework wherein the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) can develop housing projects, or assist eligible developers in these efforts. Importantly, the bill proposes exemptions from various laws and regulations concerning planning, zoning, and construction standards, which would accelerate the housing development process. However, this exemption is contingent upon meeting specific health and safety requirements and obtaining approval from local legislative bodies.
Contention
There are potential points of contention surrounding HB 839. Critics of the bill may argue that the proposed exemptions could undermine local authority and potentially lead to developments that do not align with community standards or planning goals. While the bill aims to facilitate housing development, questions about environmental impacts and community suitability of rapid developments on previously restricted lands may arise, particularly since the bill mandates an environmental impact statement if projects are located on preservation or conservation zoned lands.
Final_note
Overall, HB 839 represents a significant legislative initiative aimed at addressing housing shortages in Hawaii, while balancing the need for local approval and consideration of environmental impacts. As it moves through the legislative process, the discussions surrounding it will likely reflect broader concerns about growth, sustainability, and community governance.
Relating to prompt review of land development applications and the award of court costs and attorney's fees against a political subdivision in certain actions.