Dental health plans; establish certain provisions related to insurers bundling and downcoding.
Impact
By enacting SB2273, the Mississippi legislature seeks to enhance patient choice in selecting dental providers while ensuring that insurance practices do not undermine the viability of dental care services. The bill seeks to eliminate barriers that could prevent patients from accessing necessary dental treatments while maintaining the rights of dental professionals to be compensated fairly for their services. The change will bring significant adjustments to how dental insurance policies are structured, ideally resulting in a more equitable relationship between insurers, dental providers, and patients. The effective date for the provisions in this bill is set for July 1, 2024, allowing time for the insurance industry to adjust accordingly.
Summary
Senate Bill 2273 aims to amend Section 83-51-3 of the Mississippi Code to address specific practices related to dental health plans. The bill prohibits insurers from maintaining a dental plan that is based on a provider's contracted fee, and it also restricts the use of downcoding or bundling in a way that interferes with the ability of dental providers to collect proper fees for their services. Insurers must provide detailed explanations for any downcoding or bundling that affects reimbursement, ensuring transparency in the billing process. This legislation is anticipated to improve billing clarity and provide better protection for dental providers under the state’s dental insurance framework.
Contention
Some potential points of contention regarding SB2273 may arise from insurers who are accustomed to using downcoding and bundling as cost-control mechanisms. Critics may argue that the bill could lead to increased premiums or reduced flexibility in financial arrangements between insurance providers and dental professionals. Furthermore, there may be concerns about the implementation and monitoring of these changes, particularly how transparency will be enforced and whether it will lead to additional administrative burdens for insurance companies.
Medicaid; telehealth services provided by FQHCs, rural health clinics and community mental health centers reimbursed at same rate as face-to-face encounters.
Relating to court costs imposed on conviction and deposited to the courthouse security fund or the municipal court building security fund; increasing fees.