The primary effect of AB2413 appears to be the clarification of legal terminology within the Public Utilities Act. By making nonsubstantive changes to how the act is referenced, the legislation does not alter existing policies or regulatory powers but enhances the understanding and interpretation of the law. This could streamline certain legal processes and reduce ambiguity in the application of the Act, benefiting both the regulatory bodies and the entities they oversee.
Summary
AB2413, introduced by Assembly Member Luz Rivas, seeks to amend Section 201 of the Public Utilities Code, primarily concerning the nomenclature of the Public Utilities Act. This amendment aims to ensure clarity and consistency within the legal language of the act, emphasizing the overarching authority of the California Public Utilities Commission. The bill operates within the framework of existing laws that govern public utilities, asserting legislative control over the commission's function and authority.
Contention
While AB2413 is not expected to generate significant controversy due to its nonsubstantive nature, discussions among various stakeholders may center around the importance of precise language in legal texts. Any changes, even those perceived as slight, can elicit scrutiny regarding their implications for regulatory authority and operational transparency. However, given the context of this amendment, it seems less likely to be a focal point for public debate compared to broader public utility issues.