Oklahoma Senate Bill SB60

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/19/21

Caption

Motor vehicles; specifying prohibited usage of electronic devices in a school zone. Emergency.

Impact

The enactment of SB60 will modify how the Oklahoma motor vehicle laws govern the use of electronic devices. It introduces a $100 fine for those caught using such devices in motion within school zones, thus creating a deterrent against distracted driving in vulnerable areas. Importantly, the law will not penalize drivers with points on their driving records, which aligns with the bill's broader intent to encourage compliance without disproportionately harming individuals' driving privileges.

Summary

Senate Bill 60, known as the Bobbi White Act of 2021, primarily addresses the usage of handheld electronic devices while driving, specifically prohibiting their use in school zones during normal school hours. The bill aims to enhance public safety by reducing distracted driving, particularly in areas near schools where children are present. It amends existing laws regarding text messaging while operating a vehicle, clearly articulating what constitutes prohibited acts and establishing penalties for violations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB60 appears largely supportive among advocates for road safety and child protection, who see it as a timely response to increasing concerns over distracted driving. However, there are concerns from some legislators about potential overreach and the enforcement of the law, especially considering the existing distractions drivers face. The balance between enhancing safety and maintaining the principle of personal responsibility is a critical point of discussion.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of the fines and the specifics of enforcement. Critics argue that standardizing penalties and limiting local governmental discretion could detract from areas that wish to impose stricter measures. Additionally, certain provisions exempting emergency communications may lead to ambiguities regarding what constitutes an 'emergency.' The debate reflects broader tensions surrounding legislation that affects personal freedoms in the name of collective safety.