Oklahoma House Bill HB1652

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21

Caption

Professions and occupations; Massage Therapy Practice Act; modifying various provisions; providing for licensure of massage therapy establishments; emergency.

Impact

One of the pivotal changes brought by HB1652 is the establishment of a clearer licensing structure for both individual massage therapists and the businesses they run. This legislation requires therapists to be certified by the State Board of Cosmetology and Barbering, which will implement a rigorous review process, including consideration of an applicant's criminal history. By enforcing these new regulations, the bill aims to ensure that practitioners meet the necessary competencies and uphold the professional standards required to safeguard the public's health and safety.

Summary

House Bill 1652 significantly modifies the Massage Therapy Practice Act to enhance the regulatory framework for massage therapy in Oklahoma. The bill updates several definitions, notably clarifying the roles and expectations for licensed massage therapists and the establishments they operate. It emphasizes the importance of licensure, mandating that all individuals practicing massage therapy obtain a state-issued license before offering their services. The bill also outlines the types of education and experience required to qualify for a massage therapy license, thus promoting standardized practices across the state.

Contention

Despite its intention to streamline and enhance standards within the industry, the bill has faced criticism regarding how it handles the issue of applicants with criminal histories. Advocates for mental health and rehabilitation have expressed concerns that the language could unjustly limit opportunities for individuals seeking a second chance after past convictions. Moreover, there are discussions surrounding the potential economic impact on small massage therapy establishments due to the increased licensure fees and regulatory demands. Balancing public safety with fair access to the profession remains a contentious issue in the ongoing legislative dialogue.