Health insurance; prohibiting insurers from refusing coverage under certain circumstances; requiring out-of-network providers be reimbursed at the same rate as in-network providers. Emergency.
Summary
Senate Bill 17 is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing access to health care coverage for patients in Oklahoma, specifically regarding durable medical equipment. The bill prohibits health benefit plans, health maintenance organizations (HMOs), and preferred provider organizations (PPOs) from refusing coverage for durable medical equipment and supplies that are prescribed by health care providers, irrespective of the provider's network status. This provision ensures that patients can receive necessary medical equipment even from out-of-network providers if a suitable in-network option is not available within a specified distance from their location.
Additionally, SB17 mandates that out-of-network providers be reimbursed at the same rate as in-network providers for covered services. This requirement aims to eliminate disparities in patient care and provide equitable treatment to patients regardless of whether they choose to utilize in-network or out-of-network health care options. The legislation acknowledges the pressing need for timely access to medical supplies and equipment, particularly in cases where time-sensitive treatment is required.
The bill includes an emergency clause, indicating that it is intended to take effect immediately upon passage and approval. This measure is designed to ensure that the benefits of the bill are quickly realized by individuals who depend on durable medical equipment for their health needs. By streamlining reimbursement processes and offering more comprehensive coverage options, SB17 seeks to improve the overall quality of health care for residents of Oklahoma.
Notable points of contention surrounding SB17 may revolve around the potential financial implications for insurance providers who would have to adjust their reimbursement models to accommodate these changes. Insurers may voice concerns regarding the increased costs associated with mandatory reimbursements to out-of-network providers at in-network rates. As discussions progress, stakeholders, including insurers and health care advocates, may debate the balance between patient access to care and the financial sustainability of health insurance markets.
Health insurance; prohibiting insurers from refusing coverage under certain circumstances; requiring out-of-network providers be reimbursed at the same rate as in-network providers. Emergency.
Behavioral health; requiring health insurer to cover certain out-of-network services under certain circumstances; providing exceptions. Effective date.
Behavioral health; requiring health insurer to cover certain out-of-network services under certain circumstances; providing exceptions. Effective date.