Oklahoma House Bill HB1466

Oklahoma 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23

Caption

Public health and safety; definitions; health care professionals; gender transition; exceptions; statute of limitations; license revocation; state license holders; certain claims; civil actions; attorney fees; effective date.

Impact

If enacted, HB1466 would significantly alter the landscape of health care related to gender identity among minors in Oklahoma. Healthcare providers who perform or induce prohibited procedures could face strict consequences, including license revocation by the Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision. Moreover, individuals could pursue civil actions against those in violation of the legislation, leading to potential financial penalties and legal ramifications for healthcare professionals involved in gender transitions without compliance with the law.

Summary

House Bill 1466 aims to prohibit certain health care professionals from performing gender transition procedures on individuals under the age of 18. The bill lays out specific definitions for terms such as 'child' and 'health care provider', and explicitly lists the types of medical procedures that would be banned, including surgeries that result in sterilization and hormone treatments that could induce infertility. The intent of the bill is framed around public health and safety, reflecting concerns about the implications of gender transition procedures on minors.

Contention

The bill raises considerable debate regarding the rights of minors and parental authority in medical decision-making. Advocates for the bill argue it is a necessary protective measure for minors, while opponents claim it undermines medical autonomy and access to necessary healthcare for youth experiencing gender dysphoria. Critics also express concerns about the broader implications of restricting medical treatments, suggesting it could lead to negative mental health outcomes for affected individuals. The enforcement mechanism, relying on private civil actions as the sole avenue for addressing violations, has also been a point of contention, as it could create a litigation-heavy environment around sensitive health decisions.