Oklahoma Senate Bill SCR4

Oklahoma 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Engrossed: 4/5/23
• Enrolled: 4/6/23
• Passed: 4/6/23

Caption

Concurrent resolution; supporting the conservation of fish and wildlife resources; and encouraging Oklahomans to teach hunting and angling to youth.

Impact

The resolution highlights the economic contributions of sportsmen and sportswomen to local economies through recreational activities related to hunting and fishing. Funds generated from hunting and fishing licenses contribute importantly to the conservation budget of the Department of Wildlife Conservation, which stands at around $61.5 million. The resolution underscores how educating youth about these activities not only enriches personal competencies but also supports economic growth through outdoor recreational tourism and related small businesses.

Summary

SCR4 is a concurrent resolution that supports the conservation of fish and wildlife resources in Oklahoma and encourages the state's citizens to teach hunting and angling to the youth. The resolution celebrates Oklahoma's longstanding tradition of hunting and fishing, tracing its roots back before statehood. It recognizes the Department of Wildlife Conservation's role in managing and protecting fish and wildlife habitats while fostering a community of hunters and anglers. This educational initiative aims to instill a sense of responsibility towards natural resources in younger generations, promoting stewardship among future caretakers of the land.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR4 is generally positive, reflecting a bipartisan appreciation for the roles hunting and fishing play in both conservation efforts and the local economy. There is a collective acknowledgment among lawmakers regarding the importance of preserving these practices and passing them on to future generations. This reflects a shared commitment to environmental conservation and fostering community ties through outdoor activities.

Contention

While SCR4 is primarily a supportive resolution that encourages traditional practices, it does not entail any new regulations or funding initiatives. This could lead to discussions about the adequacy of current measures for wildlife protection and management. Some stakeholders may argue for more structured programs or legislative actions directed toward active engagement in conservation practices or statewide initiatives that further incentivize hunting and angling education among youth.