Administrative Procedures Act; requiring agencies to submit all received public comment with proposed permanent rule submission. Emergency.
Impact
The implementation of SB180 will significantly influence how state agencies manage the administrative rule-making process. By ensuring that public comments are included in submissions for proposed rules, the bill aims to create a more inclusive environment for community input. This change could lead agencies to be more cautious and responsive when drafting rules, as they will have to account for public sentiment and reactions before finalizing regulations. This could ultimately reshape agency practices and improve the relationship between government and constituents.
Summary
SB180 seeks to amend the Administrative Procedures Act in Oklahoma to require that all public comments regarding proposed rules be submitted alongside the proposed permanent rules. This bill emphasizes the importance of public input in the rulemaking process and aims to enhance transparency within government agencies. It also mandates that agencies file copies of both the new rules and the agency's report on public comments with various high-ranking officials shortly after adoption, reinforcing accountability in the regulatory process.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB180 appears largely positive among its supporters, who argue that the legislation represents a step forward in facilitating civil engagement and ensuring that the voices of individuals are considered in the governance process. However, there may be concerns from certain factions about the potential for delayed rule adoption due to the added requirements for documenting and reviewing public comments, which might be seen as bureaucratic by some critics.
Contention
Notable points of contention have arisen regarding the feasibility of implementing the public comment requirement. Critics may argue that while increased transparency is valuable, this measure could inadvertently complicate and delay the rulemaking process. Additionally, discussions may arise around the adequacy of public engagement efforts and whether simply requiring comment submissions will genuinely lead to more effective governance. The urgency declared in the bill suggests that supporters believe immediate action is necessary to fortify the existing procedures, indicating a potentially serious concern regarding current practices.
Carry Over
Administrative Procedures Act; clarifying scope of rulemaking authority; requiring inclusion of statutory authority with administrative rules. Effective date.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.