Water conservation: water use objectives.
If enacted, SB 1185 would significantly alter the framework governing how water suppliers manage water use objectives. Key provisions include a prohibition against establishing water use objectives that would mandate reductions exceeding 20% when compared to actual water use in 2023. This means suppliers would have to ensure that any new objectives do not exceed prior levels of usage, thus balancing the need for conservation with operational realities for suppliers. The bill also allows for variances from set objectives, providing flexibility for suppliers to adapt to unique circumstances while obligating the board to develop a self-certification process to validate these variances.
Senate Bill 1185, introduced by Senator Niello, aims to amend existing regulations related to water conservation and efficiency standards in California. The bill revises the responsibilities of the State Water Resources Control Board regarding water use objectives, eliminating the requirement for the board to adopt specific standards on water loss. Instead, it shifts the focus towards considering policies related to urban water use objectives while setting forth new standards, policies, and procedures overall. The legislative intent behind this bill is to enhance the efficient use of water resources in the state, particularly in urban areas, amid ongoing challenges related to water scarcity and conservation.
The sentiment surrounding SB 1185 appears to be cautious but generally supportive from stakeholders interested in water management and conservation. Proponents argue that the changes bring necessary flexibility in managing water supplies in a way that is realistic and achievable for urban water suppliers. However, there may be concerns regarding how effectively the proposed self-certification process will hold suppliers accountable and whether it addresses the underlying challenges of water loss and sustainability adequately. Overall, there remains a significant emphasis on the need for efficient water use amidst changing environmental conditions.
Key points of contention regarding SB 1185 involve the effectiveness and potential outcomes of the new self-certification process for agua suppliers and what it means for accountability in water management. Critics might argue that reducing the state's role in water loss standards could lead to less rigorous oversight and potential exploitation of variances. Advocates for local water management may express concerns about how the changes could impact regional water policies and the ability for local areas to address specific conservation needs if fewer state mandates on water loss are enforced.