Driving under the influence; creating the Drunk Impaired Accountability Law (DIAL); requiring the development of certain cellular phone tracking application; effective date.
Impact
The bill impacts existing DUI laws by instituting new conditions for offenders, particularly regarding assessments and evaluations related to alcohol and drug abuse. It introduces stricter penalties for multiple offenses, such as mandatory community service and the use of ignition interlock devices. The requirement for offenders to undergo evaluations and follow treatment recommendations is designed to promote rehabilitation, while the possibility of enhanced penalties for repeat offenders aims to deter recidivism.
Summary
House Bill 2151, known as the Drunk Impaired Accountability Law (D.A.I.L.), aims to enhance accountability for individuals convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) by implementing a tracking system via a cellular phone application. The bill mandates the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety to develop or contract a mobile application that tracks the location of individuals convicted of DUI offenses, allowing law enforcement to monitor offenders without revealing their personal information. This proposal is expected to strengthen law enforcement's ability to prevent repeat offenses and streamline the monitoring of past offenders.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the legislation reflects a blend of support and concern. Proponents argue that the tracking system will improve public safety and hold offenders accountable, while also addressing the need for rehabilitation. Critics, however, express apprehension about potential privacy invasions and the implications of constant surveillance, which may disproportionately affect certain groups. The overall discourse centers around balancing punitive measures with safeguards for individual rights.
Contention
Notably, the implementation of the tracking application has raised questions about its effectiveness in actually reducing DUI incidents. Lawmakers have debated the potential stigmatization of individuals who are tracked and the nuances of using location data as evidence while ensuring it does not constitute probable cause for stopping drivers. Furthermore, there is contention about the funding and operational aspects involved in developing the application alongside the ethical concerns of monitoring individuals through technology.
Carry Over
Driving under the influence; creating the Drunk Impaired Accountability Law (DIAL); requiring the development of certain cellular phone tracking application; effective date.
Driving under the influence; creating the Drunk Impaired Accountability Law (DIAL); requiring the development of certain cellular phone tracking application; effective date.
Child sexual exploitation; modifying certain life without parole sentencing; requiring certain punishments; requiring certain advisement; defining term; modifying certain confinement criteria. Effective date.
Motor vehicles; requiring certain persons complete Impaired Driver Accountability Program; allowing for satisfaction of requirements under certain condition; effective date.
Driving under the influence; creating the Drunk Impaired Accountability Law (DIAL); requiring the development of certain cellular phone tracking application; effective date.