Oklahoma House Bill HJR1001

Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23

Caption

Constitutional amendment; requiring certain vote of people to change compensation of members of the Legislature; ballot title; directing filing.

Impact

If enacted, HJR1001 aims to bring increased oversight and transparency to how legislative compensation is determined in Oklahoma. By transferring the authority to set compensation away from the Legislature itself to an appointed board, the resolution seeks to create a framework that is more accountable to the public. This shift is intended to minimize potential conflicts of interest and ensure that compensation adjustments are made based on rational evaluations rather than political pressures. Additionally, the requirement for public approval adds a layer of democratic involvement in the legislative process, which some view as a necessary check on governmental power.

Summary

HJR1001 is a Joint Resolution that proposes an amendment to Section 21 of Article V of the Oklahoma Constitution. The key feature of this amendment is the establishment of a Legislative Board to oversee compensation for members of the Legislature. This Board is tasked with setting compensation levels for legislators and will consist of members appointed by various officials, including the Governor and leaders of the legislative chambers. Significantly, the resolution mandates that any recommendations for changes in compensation made by this Board must be approved by a majority of voters, making it necessary to refer such amendments to a public vote at the next General Election.

Contention

However, the proposal could face pushback from lawmakers concerned about the loss of self-determination regarding their compensation. Critics may argue that placing compensation decisions in the hands of an external Board might lead to inefficiencies or a disconnect from the realities of legislative duties. Moreover, the requirement for voter approval on compensation changes may deter necessary adjustments that could be essential for attracting and retaining qualified candidates for public office. These potential points of contention reflect broader debates on how to balance legislative autonomy with accountability to constituents.