Virginia House Bill HB139

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/7/22
• Refer: 1/7/22
• Report Pass: 2/8/22
• Engrossed: 2/11/22
• Refer: 2/16/22
• Report Pass: 2/25/22
• Enrolled: 3/3/22
• Chaptered: 4/11/22
• Passed: 4/11/22

Caption

Slavery & Subsqt. De Jure & De Facto Racial & Econ. Discrimination Against African Americans; study.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would extend the existence of the Commission to Study Slavery and Subsequent De Jure and De Facto Racial and Economic Discrimination Against African Americans until July 1, 2024. This extension suggests the state recognizes the importance of continued examination of these historical injustices in order to promote awareness and potentially guide legislative actions aimed at reparative justice. By formalizing this commission, the bill aims to elevate the discourse surrounding racial and economic equity in Virginia.

Summary

House Bill 139 aims to address the historical impacts of slavery and subsequent racial and economic discrimination against African Americans by establishing a commission to study the ramifications of these issues. The legislation emphasizes the need for understanding the depth and breadth of discrimination that has occurred historically as well as its lasting effects on African American communities. The bill seeks to ensure that there is a dedicated body that can explore these aspects diligently and present findings that may inform future policymaking and educational initiatives.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 139 appears to be positive, as evidenced by a unanimous voting outcome in the Senate, where it passed with 40 yeas and no nays. This overwhelming support suggests that there is a collective acknowledgment among lawmakers of the need to confront and study the historical injustices resulting from slavery and discrimination faced by African Americans. Advocates likely view this as a step forward in acknowledging past wrongs and considering reparative approaches.

Contention

Notably, while the bill has garnered significant support, there may be underlying complexities regarding how the findings of the commission will be applied or interpreted in the context of current policies. Critics might voice concerns about potential reparative measures or discussions that emerge from the commission's research, fearing that it could lead to contentious debates over reparations or changes in racial equity policies. The commission's further formalization could also raise questions about funding and resource allocation for the studies it conducts.