Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters and the right to vote (second reference).
Impact
The proposed changes in HJR28 would significantly impact Virginia’s voting laws by removing barriers for those who have completed their incarceration for felony convictions, thus expanding voting participation among the populace. Additionally, the amendment would reinforce the importance of restoring civil rights, allowing for increased civic engagement from previously disenfranchised individuals. This aligns with broader national discussions on voting rights and has the potential to influence public policy regarding civil rights across the state.
Summary
HJR28 is a proposed amendment to the Constitution of Virginia that aims to clarify and expand the qualifications for voters in the Commonwealth. The bill establishes that in order to vote, individuals must be U.S. citizens, at least eighteen years old, fulfill specific residency requirements, and be registered to vote. Notably, it stipulates that individuals convicted of a felony may regain the right to vote upon release from incarceration, provided they have their civil rights restored by appropriate authorities. The amendment also stresses that the right to vote cannot be abridged by law except under certain conditions regarding felony convictions and mental competency.
Contention
The reception of HJR28 has been mixed, with supporters advocating for the modernization of voting rights and a more inclusive electoral process. On the other hand, opponents might argue that the amendment fails to adequately address concerns regarding the competencies of individuals adjudicated as mentally incompetent. This contention points to the balance legislators must find between ensuring accessible voting rights and maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.
Voting_history
During its consideration, HJR28 faced challenges in committee, resulting in a failure to recommend reporting, with a vote tally of 4 in favor and 6 against. This voting history highlights the contentious atmosphere surrounding amendments to voting rights, reflecting differing opinions on how to best approach the qualifications for voters and the implications of restoring voting rights post-incarceration.