Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2322

Introduced
1/19/24  
Introduced
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Refer
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Report Pass
2/29/24  
Refer
2/16/24  
Engrossed
3/1/24  
Report Pass
2/29/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/15/24  
Report Pass
3/15/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Report Pass
4/5/24  
Refer
3/22/24  

Caption

Relating To Water Quality.

Impact

The enactment of SB2322 will likely reinforce existing state mandates regarding environmental management and public health. By institutionalizing the sampling process during brown water advisories, the bill seeks to protect beachgoers from potential health risks associated with contaminated waters. It underscores the state's commitment to public health and the safeguarding of natural resources, aligning with broader goals of sustainability and environmental stewardship.

Summary

Senate Bill 2322 aims to enhance water quality management in Hawaii by requiring the Department of Health to continue its sampling and analysis of Tier 1 beaches during brown water advisories. The bill mandates that the clean water branch of the Department should follow its regular monitoring schedule while ensuring staff and supplies are available for sample collection. These measures will be enforced as long as hazardous conditions subsist, emphasizing the intention to maintain public safety amidst environmental concerns.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2322 appears to be largely positive, particularly among environmental advocates and public health officials who recognize the importance of continuous monitoring of beach waters. Proponents argue that the bill strengthens public health responses and underscores the state's readiness to address environmental emergencies. Nonetheless, discussions may also arise about the adequacy of resources and staff to effectively implement these measures, which could influence public perception and legislative support.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, some concerns might surface regarding the practical implications of the bill. Critics could argue about the potential financial and logistical burdens it places on the Department of Health and its ability to fulfill the mandated responsibilities. Additionally, the definition of 'hazardous conditions' in the bill raises questions about interpretation and enforcement, which could lead to discussions about accountability and transparency in environmental management practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

HI SB508

Relating To The Environment.

HI SB508

Relating To The Environment.

HI SB350

Relating To The Environment.

HI SB2984

Relating To The Environment.

HI SB664

Relating To Water Quality.

HI HB182

Relating To The Environment.

HI HB182

Relating To The Environment.

HI SB619

Relating To Stream Water Quality.

HI SB2606

Relating To Water Quality Management.

HI SB623

Water quality: Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.