Relative to licensure of case management service providers and relative to payment by the state of a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.
Impact
The implementation of SB 333 is expected to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding home health care and case management services in New Hampshire. It mandates that individuals have the freedom to choose any qualified case management provider, thereby promoting autonomy and individualized care. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to prevent conflicts of interest for case management service providers, ensuring that they do not deliver case management activities and other services to the same individual. This is aimed at mitigating the potential for bias in service provision and ensuring that clients receive candid and impartial support.
Summary
Senate Bill 333 focuses on the licensure of case management service providers, defining them as a specific type of home health care provider under New Hampshire law. The bill amends existing regulations to formally recognize case management services as an entity that assists individuals in accessing necessary medical, social, educational, and other services, particularly for those transitioning to a community setting. Proponents of the bill advocate for the establishment of clear standards for case management services, which they argue is essential for safeguarding the interests of individuals who rely on such services.
Contention
Despite the bill's intended benefits, it has not been without controversy. Opponents may argue that the regulatory burden imposed on service providers could limit their ability to operate effectively or may complicate access to services for individuals in need. There is also concern about how the new definitions and regulations might affect existing providers that may struggle to meet the new licensure requirements. Additionally, the regulation of case management services introduces questions about oversight and accountability, which could provoke further debate among stakeholders in the health and social services sectors.
Relative to the rate of the business profits tax, and relative to payment by the state to political subdivisions of an amount equal to a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.
Relative to the department of health and human services management of social security payments, supplemental security income payments, and veterans benefits for children in foster care.