Calling for the federal government to construct a nuclear waste repository to permanently store our nation's nuclear waste.
Impact
The passage of HR16 would primarily impact state laws relating to nuclear energy and waste management. By bringing attention to the need for a national storage solution, the resolution seeks to alleviate the burden on states like New Hampshire, which currently manage the challenges presented by on-site storage of radioactive materials. Additionally, it calls for federal action, possibly leading to changes in regulations and appropriations aimed at developing long-term storage facilities for nuclear waste.
Summary
House Resolution 16 (HR16) calls upon the federal government to construct a permanent repository for the storage of the nation's nuclear waste. The resolution highlights the current absence of such a facility in the United States and emphasizes the safety risks associated with storing nuclear waste on-site at power generation facilities. As New Hampshire has its own storage site located in Seabrook, the resolution addresses both the local implications and the broader national context of nuclear waste management.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HR16 is largely supportive among state representatives and constituents concerned about nuclear safety. Many see the need for a federal response as a pressing issue, given the potential risks associated with the current methods of nuclear waste storage. Conversely, there may be some contention regarding how the federal government will handle its responsibility once a repository is established, including the logistics of waste transport and safety measures involved.
Contention
Notable points of contention around HR16 include the implications of federal versus state control over nuclear waste management and the effectiveness of federal facilities in ensuring safety. Additionally, there may be discussions about the types of locations suitable for such repositories and how communities hosting these facilities would be treated. The resolution essentially opens up a dialogue on federal accountability and safety regulation in the nuclear sector.
Urges the Federal Government to recognize the unsuitability of Yucca Mountain as the site for a repository to store and dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. (BDR R-945)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President and the Secretary of State should ensure that the Government of Canada does not permanently store nuclear waste in the Great Lakes Basin.
Urging the United States Congress and the Department of Energy to fulfill federal obligations regarding spent nuclear fuel and establish a permanent repository
Urges President of United States and United States Congress to annually financially compensate every local unit of government in United States where there is located decommissioned nuclear power plant in which spent nuclear fuel is stored.
Urges President of United States and United States Congress to annually financially compensate every local unit of government in United States where there is located decommissioned nuclear power plant in which spent nuclear fuel is stored.
Urges President of United States and United States Congress to annually financially compensate every local unit of government in United States where there is located decommissioned nuclear power plant in which spent nuclear fuel is stored.
Urges President of United States and United States Congress to annually financially compensate every local unit of government in United States where there is located decommissioned nuclear power plant in which spent nuclear fuel is stored.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the President and the Secretary of State should ensure that the Government of Canada does not permanently store nuclear waste in the Great Lakes Basin.