The passage of SB2130 is expected to have significant implications for the state's law enforcement structure. By formally including correctional officers in the definition of peace officers, the bill strengthens the legal position of these individuals and may provide them with greater clarity regarding their roles and responsibilities. This amendment can enhance the recognition of correctional officers as essential components of the law enforcement community, which could also influence training and operational policies across correctional facilities.
Summary
Senate Bill 2130 seeks to amend and reenact the definition of 'peace officers' within the North Dakota Century Code. The bill specifically expands the definition to encompass correctional officers, alongside individuals employed by state law enforcement agencies or political subdivisions who are tasked with enforcing criminal laws and possess full arrest powers. This legislative measure was introduced to clarify the status and responsibilities of peace officers in the state, thereby ensuring that correctional officers are formally acknowledged within this legal framework.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB2130 appears largely positive within the legislative assembly, as indicated by the strong majority voting in favor of the bill, with a vote outcome of 91 in favor and only 2 against. Supporters argue that recognizing correctional officers as peace officers is a necessary step toward enhancing the professionalism and operational capabilities of the state’s law enforcement agencies. The accompanying discussions suggest that this recognition fosters a more unified approach to law enforcement within the state.
Contention
Despite the prevailing support, some dissenting voices may express concern regarding the implications of expanding the definition of peace officers. Critics might question whether this change could lead to an increase in the scope of authority granted to correctional officers. However, specifics around the debates and contentions were not highlighted in the available voting records or discussions, indicating a relative consensus on the necessity of this amendment within the legislative framework.
Criminal code definitions, weapons definitions, mandatory prison terms for armed offenders, and persons who are not to possess firearms; and to provide a penalty.