North Dakota Senate Bill SB2171

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23
• Report Pass: 2/3/23
• Engrossed: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/15/23
• Report DNP: 3/13/23

Caption

Public employees retirement system health benefits.

Impact

A significant aspect of SB2171 is the introduction of an enhanced coverage option for state employees participating in the uniform group insurance program. Under the proposed legislation, by January 1, 2024, state employees would be able to opt into this enhanced coverage for ACA services. The financial responsibilities for the coverage costs will fall on the employees themselves, as funds will need to be collected from state employers and forwarded to the insurance board for management. This shift could potentially broaden the scope of health benefits available to public employees, albeit with associated costs to those employees opting for enhanced coverage.

Summary

Senate Bill 2171, titled 'Public Employees Retirement System Health Benefits', proposes amendments relating to the health benefits provided to public employees in North Dakota. The bill aims to create a new section within the North Dakota Century Code, specifically addressing enhancements to the health coverage options available to state employees. These changes are designed to align with federal provisions under the Affordable Care Act, ensuring that eligible employees have access to necessary health services that may not be included in the existing insurance program.

Contention

Discussion around SB2171 has indicated varying perspectives on its impact. Supporters argue that the bill provides much-needed flexibility for employees to access more comprehensive healthcare options, potentially improving overall employee welfare. In contrast, critics may raise concerns about the implications of setting additional financial burdens on employees who opt for enhanced services, particularly in comparison to existing health coverage provided under the uniform group insurance program. Additionally, there may be contention regarding how these changes may affect the state's budget and resources allocated to employee benefits in future bienniums.