New Hampshire House Bill HB1388

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/1/21
• Refer: 12/1/21
• Report Pass: 2/3/22
• Engrossed: 3/1/22
• Refer: 3/1/22
• Report Pass: 4/20/22
• Enrolled: 6/7/22
• Chaptered: 6/22/22
• Passed: 6/22/22

Caption

Relative to the unsolicited disclosure of an intimate image.

Impact

The enactment of HB1388 is expected to have implications on existing laws concerning public indecency and privacy. By including specific provisions for the unsolicited transmission of intimate images, the bill broadens the scope of existing legal frameworks to cover digital harassment. Moreover, its implementation may lead to an increase in cases processed through the judicial system, as newly defined offenses under this law could result in individuals being prosecuted for non-consensual sharing. This could indirectly place pressure on public defender resources and other components of the judicial system, as highlighted in the fiscal impact notes regarding expenditures.

Summary

House Bill 1388 aims to address the issue of unsolicited disclosure of intimate images by establishing criminal penalties for such actions. The bill stipulates that a person can be charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly transmit an intimate image to another person who has not consented to receive it. This legislation represents a significant legislative effort to protect individuals from non-consensual sharing of intimate content and enhances the legal framework for privacy and personal dignity in the digital age. The bill is sponsored by a number of representatives and falls under the jurisdiction of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee.

Contention

Points of contention surrounding HB1388 include potential debates on the effectiveness of punitive measures versus preventative education in addressing digital harassment. Some critics may argue that imposing criminal penalties could lead to underreporting by victims who fear legal repercussions or further harassment. Additionally, legal experts and advocates may raise concerns about the vagueness of definitions surrounding 'intimate images' and the implications it could have on lawful communication. The balance between protecting personal privacy and ensuring freedom of speech may also become a focal point of discussion as the bill progresses through legislative reviews.