New Hampshire House Bill HB1269

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/19/21
• Refer: 11/19/21
• Report Pass: 3/4/22
• Engrossed: 3/22/22
• Refer: 3/22/22
• Report Pass: 4/20/22
• Enrolled: 6/27/22

Caption

Relative to certain legislative study committees.

Impact

The impact of HB 1269 would be primarily felt in the legislative structure and operational protocols of New Hampshire. By repealing dormant commissions and instituting stricter timelines for the re-authorization of study committees, the bill seeks to mitigate unnecessary expenditures and enhance the legislative process. Additionally, the requirement for a formalized reporting mechanism will ensure that the work of committees is transparent and accessible to both legislators and the public, ultimately fostering a more informed electorate.

Summary

House Bill 1269 addresses the regulation and management of legislative study committees in New Hampshire. The bill proposes the repeal of several inactive commissions that have not been effective in fulfilling their intended roles, thus streamlining the process and ensuring that resources are allocated to active entities. New provisions are included requiring study committees to be either repealed or re-authorized every five years, limiting their membership to a maximum of 15 members, and mandating that comprehensive annual reports be compiled and disseminated by the legislative staff. This aims to improve accountability and efficiency in government operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1269 appears to be generally supportive among those who advocate for efficient government operations, as it reflects a proactive approach to optimizing legislative functions. However, there may be concerns among individuals or groups associated with the repealed commissions, who could view these changes as a loss of representation or oversight in specific areas. Thus, while the bill is perceived positively by efficiency proponents, it might face opposition from stakeholders directly impacted by the changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the specific commissions being repealed and the implications for areas they covered, such as health care oversight and youth development. Advocates for these areas might argue that the lack of dedicated oversight could hinder progress or protections previously in place. Moreover, the limitation on the number and terms of committee members may lead to debates over representation, as some groups may feel underrepresented within the legislative framework.