North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1368

Introduced
1/12/23  
Refer
1/12/23  
Refer
1/24/23  
Report Pass
2/17/23  
Engrossed
2/21/23  
Refer
3/3/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  

Caption

Contracts with companies that boycott Israel and a prohibition on investments.

Impact

The introduction of HB 1368 is expected to transform how state contracts are managed, particularly concerning entities that may refuse to engage in business with Israel. This legislation aligns with similar laws adopted in other states and reflects a growing trend toward limiting the influence of boycott movements perceived to impact foreign policy. It is designed to protect the state's economic interests and to ensure that state investments and contracts do not indirectly support activities viewed as detrimental to Israel.

Summary

House Bill 1368 aims to regulate contracts involving entities that boycott Israel by prohibiting state contracts with companies that engage in boycotts against Israel or Israeli-controlled territories. The bill defines actions that constitute a boycott and establishes a process for the state to evaluate whether a company is participating in a boycott. By enacting this legislation, North Dakota seeks to prevent state resources from being allocated to businesses that align with movements perceived to be discriminatory against Israel.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1368 is primarily supportive among its sponsors and many legislators who view it as a necessary measure to safeguard state interests and foster alliances with Israel. However, it has been met with some opposition from advocacy groups and organizations that argue that such legislation could limit corporate expression and infringe upon business autonomy. Critics assert that the bill may have a chilling effect on the ability of organizations to engage in socially and politically motivated actions without fear of losing state contracts.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1368 include concerns regarding the potential infringement on free speech principles and the implications for businesses seeking to express political stances. The criteria for determining what constitutes a boycott have also been scrutinized, prompting discussions about the balance between protecting state interests and preserving corporate rights. The bill's requirement for contracts to include a prohibition against boycotting Israel may discourage companies from engaging fully in advocacy and could distort market choices based on political considerations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

ND HB89

Relating to state contracts with and investments in companies that boycott Israel.

ND SB29

Relating to state contracts with and investments in companies that boycott Israel.

ND SB134

Relating to state contracts with and investments in companies that boycott Israel.

ND HB3467

Relating to prohibitions on contracting with companies that boycott Israel

ND HB5099

Relating to prohibitions on contracting with companies that boycott Israel

ND SB439

To prohibiting discriminatory boycotts of Israel in state procurement and investments.

ND SB255

Relating to state contracts with and investments in certain companies that boycott energy companies

ND SB13

Relating to state contracts with and investments in certain companies that boycott energy companies.

ND HB2189

Relating to state contracts with and investments in certain companies that boycott energy companies.

ND HB1898

Virginia Public Procurement Act; prohibition on boycotting Israel.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.