Establishing an adult dental benefit under the state Medicaid program.
The implications of SB422 are significant as it addresses a notable gap in Medicaid coverage concerning adult dental services in New Hampshire. By extending these benefits, the state anticipates improvements in health outcomes among Medicaid beneficiaries, which may, in turn, reduce the long-term healthcare expenditures linked to dental-related health issues. The bill ensures that quality care is maintained through defined contracts with dental care organizations, paving the way for enhanced access to necessary dental services.
Additionally, the bill emphasizes a value-based care model, prioritizing efficiency and quality of care in the administrative processes of the Medicaid dental program. This innovative approach could set a precedent for other states considering similar expansions of Medicaid benefits.
SB422 aims to establish an adult dental benefit under New Hampshire's Medicaid program, specifically targeting individuals aged 21 and over. This initiative stems from a recommendation by a working group aimed at enhancing overall health and reducing costs associated with untreated oral health conditions. The bill stipulates that the Department of Health and Human Services will contract with dental managed care organizations to administer dental care through the state's Medicaid managed care system. Funding for this program is primarily sourced from a settlement with the Centene Corporation, highlighting a strategic use of financial resources to bolster healthcare services.
However, there may be points of contention surrounding the implementation of this dental benefit. Concerns may arise regarding the adequacy of funding, particularly if the anticipated benefits do not materialize by the stipulated deadlines. The provision that funds revert to the general fund if the adult dental benefit isn't implemented by June 30, 2023, has been flagged as a potential roadblock. Advocates for oral health are likely to push for a swift implementation to avoid lapses in funding, while some policymakers may question the long-term sustainability of the benefit without continuous evaluations and adjustments to the funding strategy.