The definitions of alcoholic beverage establishment and manufacturer, approval for a gaming site authorization and licensure, the maximum number of gaming sites allowed, the maximum number of pull tab devices allowed at a site, gaming licenses for alcoholic beverage establishments, electronic fifty-fifty raffles, rent limits for electronic pull tab devices, and the imposition of monetary fines for violations by third-party businesses; to provide for a legislative management study; to provide an effective date; and to declare an emergency.
Impact
The proposed amendments will have significant implications for charitable gaming in North Dakota. By regulating the approval of gaming site licenses and limiting the maximum number of sites and devices permitted per organization, the bill aims to enhance accountability and oversight within the industry. Furthermore, the implementation of a study by legislative management to evaluate statewide charitable gaming practices ensures that any potential issues are addressed comprehensively, contributing to a more structured approach to gaming regulation in the state.
Summary
Senate Bill 2304 introduces amendments to various sections of the North Dakota Century Code, aiming to refine existing regulations surrounding charitable gaming. The bill focuses on the approval process for gaming site licenses, defines the roles and responsibilities of organizations involved in charitable gaming, and outlines the maximum number of gaming sites and devices permitted. Specifically, the legislation defines what constitutes an alcoholic beverage establishment and clarifies the categorization of eligible organizations that can conduct gaming activities. Additionally, it includes provisions for monetary fines imposed for violations by licensed organizations and third-party businesses participating in charitable gaming.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 2304 has been multifaceted. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for promoting responsible gaming and ensuring that charitable organizations can operate within a clear framework. They see it as an opportunity to increase transparency and protect consumers. On the other hand, critics express concerns over potential constraints on charitable organizations, fearing that the regulations may limit their fundraising capabilities. The discussions highlight a broader conflict between regulatory oversight and the need for community engagement through charitable activities.
Contention
A key point of contention relates to the restrictions placed on the number of sites and devices a single organization can manage. While supporters believe that this will prevent exploitation and ensure fair play, detractors argue that such limitations might hinder organizations' ability to generate necessary funds for community services. Moreover, the imposition of monetary fines for non-compliance raises discussions about the fairness and effectiveness of punitive measures within the charitable gaming sector. The bill's overall impact on local charities and community welfare remains a topic of debate among lawmakers.
The maximum number of gaming sites allowed and the maximum number of electronic pull tab devices allowed at a site; and to provide for a legislative management study .
The definitions of "off sale" and "on sale", gaming site authorization and licensure, and the authorization of employees to provide limited assistance related to gaming; and to declare an emergency.
A bill to regulate monitoring of electronic communications between an incarcerated person in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that person's attorney or other legal representative, and for other purposes.