Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB69

Introduced
12/13/22  
Refer
12/28/22  
Engrossed
1/17/23  
Refer
1/19/23  
Enrolled
3/18/23  

Caption

Clarify school transportation laws related to passenger vehicles

Impact

The bill also amends existing Montana Code Annotated (MCA) sections to provide clearer definitions regarding the transportation practices for school-related activities. Its implementation is expected to streamline transportation logistics for schools, as the regulations around the use of non-bus vehicles for student transport to extracurricular events are now more defined. This could incentivize schools to use smaller, potentially more efficient vehicles for transporting students to activities, possibly saving funds that were previously tied up in depreciation calculations for broader vehicle classifications.

Summary

Senate Bill 69 (SB69) aims to clarify provisions concerning the transportation of students by school districts, specifically focusing on the definition and treatment of passenger vehicles used for special activities. The bill states explicitly that vehicles designed to carry between 8 and 15 passengers, owned by school districts, are not classified as school buses and are therefore not eligible for inclusion in the district's bus depreciation reserve fund. This is a significant amendment to current laws, altering how districts categorize and account for these vehicles financially in relation to student transportation.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB69 has been pragmatic, as it appears to address a gap in existing school transportation laws while potentially easing operational burdens for school districts. Policymakers recognize the need for flexibility in transportation arrangements without compromising safety and accountability. Stakeholders within the education system, such as school administrators and transportation committees, generally view the bill favorably, seeing it as a necessary adjustment to better meet the logistical needs of schools.

Contention

While there has been broad support, points of contention remain regarding the implications for funding if these vehicles do not qualify for depreciation. Some critics may express concerns that not recognizing these vehicles for depreciation purposes could limit the financial resources available for schools’ broader transportation needs. Ensuring that all students have access to reliable transportation without impacting the budgetary stability of school districts is a fundamental concern reflected in discussions surrounding SB69.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HB344

Require new school buses to be equipped with lap-shoulder belts

MT HB512

Require seat belts on newly purchased school buses

MT HB2607

Clarify that vehicles with a capacity larger than 10 passengers may be used to transport students provided that no more than 10 passengers may be transported at one time.

MT SB10

Clarify school finance laws related to general fund levies

MT SB1630

School buses; student transportation; vehicles

MT SB443

Relative to the definition of school transportation vehicle.

MT HB24

Clarify laws related to kindergarten

MT AB435

Vehicles: child passenger restraints.

MT HB446

AN ACT relating to public school transportation.

MT HB430

AN ACT relating to school transportation and declaring an emergency.

Similar Bills

IL HB5480

SCH CD-STATE CHARTER TRANSPORT

IL HB4918

SCH CD-TRANSPORT-TRANSIT FEES

IL SB3286

SCH CD-TRANSPORT-TRANSIT FEES

MT SB97

Implement renewable portfolio standard production tax for property tax relief

OR HB3014

Relating to approved transportation costs for school districts.

CA AB1469

School transportation.

IL SB2250

SCH CD-TRANSPORT OF PUPILS

IL SB1657

SCH CD-TRANSPORT REIMBURSE