North Dakota Senate Bill SCR4019

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/10/23
• Engrossed: 3/14/23
• Refer: 3/14/23
• Report Pass: 3/21/23

Caption

A concurrent resolution to repeal section 10 of article X of the Constitution of North Dakota, which imposes a statewide property tax levy of one mill for support of the state medical center at the University of North Dakota; and to provide an effective date.

Impact

The proposed repeal could have significant implications for state laws, particularly regarding how funding is sourced for the University of North Dakota's medical center. Eliminating the property tax levy might lead to increased reliance on alternative funding sources, such as state budgets or private donations, raising concerns about the long-term financial stability of the medical center. This shift in funding could complicate the existing financial framework and may necessitate new legislative measures or policy changes to ensure adequate support for healthcare operations.

Summary

SCR4019 is a concurrent resolution aimed at repealing Section 10 of Article X of the North Dakota Constitution, which mandates a statewide property tax levy of one mill to support the state medical center at the University of North Dakota. The proposed repeal signifies an important shift in the state's funding approach for the medical facility, potentially altering financial support mechanisms that have been established through constitutional mandates. The effective date of this resolution remains unspecified at this stage, which may influence its implementation timeline and subsequent discussions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCR4019 appears to be mixed. Some legislators may view the repeal as a positive step toward financial reform, aiming to reduce unnecessary tax burdens on property owners. Conversely, opponents could argue that this repeal jeopardizes the steady funding necessary for critical medical services provided by the state medical center, potentially leading to a decline in healthcare quality and operational challenges. The ongoing discourse suggests a division among legislative members regarding the best path forward for supporting state health initiatives.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SCR4019 include the differing perspectives on the necessity and efficiency of the property tax levy. Proponents of the repeal might argue that the levy is an outdated method of funding that needs modernization, while critics are likely to emphasize the importance of stable funding through constitutionally mandated sources to safeguard healthcare services. The debate over SCR4019 reflects broader discussions about fiscal responsibility, state support for health services, and the balance between taxation and public service funding.