Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0138

Introduced
1/18/22  
Refer
1/26/22  
Report Pass
2/4/22  
Engrossed
2/14/22  
Refer
2/15/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Enrolled
3/10/22  

Caption

Juvenile Justice Modifications

Impact

The bill also mandates that minors who are sentenced to prison by district courts are to be provisionally housed with the Division of Juvenile Justice Services until the age of 25. As such, this legislation significantly alters the traditional juvenile justice landscape, allowing for longer periods of youth under juvenile jurisdiction and adjusting how the law applies as offenders age. Stakeholders in the juvenile justice system are likely to see a shift in how juvenile offenders are processed, potentially reducing the number of minors being tried and treated as adults.

Summary

House Bill 0138 focuses on modifications within the juvenile justice system, particularly regarding how minors are treated when charged with certain criminal offenses. The bill outlines protocols for when a minor is to be transferred from a juvenile detention facility to adult jail—specifically, highlighting that if a minor is held in a detention facility and turns 25 years old while awaiting trial, they must be moved to an adult jail within 30 days. This change is aimed at streamlining the handling of juvenile offenders as they reach adulthood while still in confinement, aligning legal processes with age boundaries in the justice system.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment around HB 0138 has been mixed. Proponents argue that delaying the transfer of a minor to adult custody until they are 25 years reduces the likelihood of premature punishment and enhances rehabilitative opportunities. Conversely, opponents worry about the implications of retaining juveniles in a juvenile system for an extended period, suggesting it may not adequately address the crimes committed by older juveniles and potentially place the community at risk.

Contention

The main points of contention revolve around the balance between rehabilitation and public safety. Some legislators argue that providing a second chance for youths who commit serious crimes under the age of 25 is vital for societal reintegration, while critics express concerns about the risks associated with keeping older juvenile offenders in facilities designed for younger individuals. The complexity of evaluating a minor's maturity and culpability in serious offenses adds another layer to the ongoing debate surrounding this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT HB0060

Juvenile Justice Modifications

UT HB0299

Juvenile Justice Changes

UT HB0304

Juvenile Justice Revisions

UT HB0539

Criminal Justice Modifications

UT HB0362

Juvenile Justice Revisions

UT SB0246

Juvenile Justice Modifications

UT SB0120

Juvenile Justice Amendments

UT SB0213

Criminal Justice Modifications

UT H834

Juvenile Justice Modifications

UT HB0312

Criminal Justice Amendments

Similar Bills

TX HB12

Relating to the border prosecution unit.

TX HB3037

Relating to the border prosecution unit.

CA AB1959

Innocence Commission Pilot Programs: Post-Conviction Justice Unit.

GA HR872

Willis, Fani T.; district attorney for Atlanta Judicial Circuit; impeachment charges; vote

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2309

City attorney: state law: misdemeanor.

TX SB1908

Relating to the concurrent jurisdiction of prosecuting attorneys in adjoining districts or counties to prosecute criminal offenses involving the election laws in this state.

TX HB3797

Relating to the concurrent jurisdiction of prosecuting attorneys in adjoining districts or counties to prosecute criminal offenses involving the election laws in this state.