Michigan Senate Bill SB0003

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/23
• Refer: 1/12/23
• Report Pass: 1/25/23
• Refer: 1/25/23
• Report Pass: 1/26/23
• Engrossed: 1/26/23
• Refer: 1/26/23

Caption

Individual income tax: credit; earned income tax credit; increase. Amends sec. 272 of 1967 PA 281 (MCL 206.272).

Impact

The bill is designed to provide significant financial assistance to low- to moderate-income families through the EITC, which aims to reduce tax burdens and incentivize work. By increasing the credit percentage, the state aims to align its tax policy with federal standards more favorably and make a meaningful impact on residents’ financial stability. The retroactive nature of the bill, applying to tax years from January 1, 2022, enhances its value as it allows eligible taxpayers to benefit from the credit in a previous year, thereby providing them with additional financial relief.

Summary

Senate Bill 3, known as SB0003, seeks to amend Michigan's Income Tax Act of 1967 by adjusting the earned income tax credit (EITC) for taxpayers. The bill proposes an increase in the EITC, gradually increasing the percentage of the federal credit eligible for state credit from 6% to 30% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. Furthermore, it includes a one-time additional credit for 2022, calculated at 24% of the federal EITC, effectively offering immediate financial relief to taxpayers who qualify.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB0003 is overwhelmingly positive, with support from various advocacy groups and legislative members who recognize the need for enhanced financial support for working families. Legislators in favor emphasize the importance of the EITC as an effective tool for combating poverty and promoting economic recovery. However, concerns from some budget watchdogs include the potential impact on state revenue and the sustainability of such tax credits over the long term, indicating a nuanced debate around fiscal policy implications.

Contention

While the overall reception of SB0003 is positive, notable contention exists regarding its long-term fiscal impact on the state's budget. Critics argue that increasing tax credits can lead to reduced state revenues, potentially hampering funding for essential services. Furthermore, some express caution over public reliance on tax credits as a primary means of support for low-income individuals, suggesting that additional measures should be implemented to enhance job opportunities and workforce development alongside financial credits.