Vermont House Bill H0089

Vermont 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/23
• Refer: 1/24/23
• Engrossed: 2/10/23
• Refer: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 4/14/23
• Report Pass: 4/18/23
• Enrolled: 5/4/23
• Passed: 5/10/23

Caption

An act relating to civil and criminal procedures concerning legally protected health care activity

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to significantly impact state laws by fortifying the right to access reproductive and gender-affirming health care. It establishes that any acts of obstruction towards individuals seeking such care are subject to civil penalties. Additionally, it addresses the challenges posed by abusive litigation related to these activities, enabling aggrieved parties to seek relief through civil actions. This strengthens the state’s position in protecting health care rights against external legal challenges, particularly from states where such activities may be criminalized.

Summary

House Bill H0089 is an act that addresses civil and criminal procedures concerning legally protected health care activities in Vermont. The bill establishes protections for individuals seeking or providing reproductive health care services and gender-affirming care. It aims to ensure unobstructed access to these health services while prohibiting interference through physical obstruction or intimidation. The protections extend to activities related to insurance coverage for these services, affirming the legal rights of both providers and recipients under state law.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment towards H0089 appears to be largely supportive among groups advocating for gender and reproductive rights. Proponents of the bill highlight its importance in ensuring safe access to health care services, especially in the current climate of increasing restrictions in other jurisdictions. However, there are concerns from certain factions who argue that the bill may lead to potential conflicts over free speech and the rights of individuals to express opposing views on health care practices. These opposing sentiments amplify the ongoing debate regarding health care access and rights in the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill’s provisions against abusive litigation and its implications for free speech. Critics express concerns that the language in the bill might inhibit legitimate protests or counseling against medical procedures by designating them as obstruction. There is also apprehension regarding how the provisions for address confidentiality would be implemented and enforced, particularly with respect to victims of domestic violence and stalking who seek legislative protection while accessing health care services.