Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB86

Introduced
12/15/22  
Refer
12/28/22  
Engrossed
2/3/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  

Caption

Limiting the number of registered voters in each election precinct

Impact

The implementation of SB86 would necessitate adjustments to existing election precinct boundaries to remain compliant with the new voter limit rule. Specifically, when a precinct exceeds 2,500 registered voters, the county's governing body will be required to make necessary adjustments. However, these adjustments cannot coincide with years when a federal election is scheduled, which suggests a deliberate approach to avoid any electoral disruptions. This could also lead to more frequent discussions surrounding electoral boundaries and motivate counties to keep closer tabs on voter registration trends.

Summary

Senate Bill 86 (SB86) is a legislative proposal aimed at limiting the number of registered voters within individual election precincts in Montana. As per the bill, no precinct is allowed to contain more than 2,500 registered voters. This change seeks to maximize the convenience of electoral processes and ensure that precincts are manageable in size, which could potentially enhance voter engagement and accessibility during elections.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB86 appears to be largely supportive among legislators, particularly those favoring reforms that aim to streamline the election process and enhance voter representation. The unanimous passage through the Senate, with a vote of 50-0, reflects this positive sentiment. However, potential opposition may stem from concerns about how frequent changes to precinct boundaries could confuse voters or complicate the electoral process.

Contention

While the bill received unanimous support, discussions may arise regarding the practicality and implications of implementing such limits on registered voters per precinct. Some legislators might raise concerns about the challenges of adjusting precinct boundaries and how these changes would specifically impact local communities, especially in areas with fluctuating populations. The debate could also encompass discussions on whether the establishment of voter limits could inadvertently disenfranchise segments of the electorate, depending on the efficiency of the adjustment process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SB620

Increasing maximum number of registered voters per precinct and distance between polling places

MT SB184

Provide that only contested precinct committee men/women need to be on the primary election ballot

MT HB619

Provides relative to precincts with fewer than three hundred registered voters and the payment of election expenses in certain such precincts (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

MT HB2876

Elections; mailing; curing; canvassing; precincts

MT SB416

Revise timeline for changes to precinct boundaries after redistricting

MT HB1358

Elections; requirements for precincts, waiver for split precinct or precinct below the minimum size.

MT HB1725

Relating to the maximum number of registered voters contained in a county election precinct.

MT HB725

Require that individuals may not be a precinct committee representative of more than one political party

MT HB3450

Relating to county election precincts.

MT SB266

Elections; increasing number of affected registered votes to establish a subprecinct. Effective date.

Similar Bills

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

MS JR1

Mississippi House of Representatives; reapportion.

KY HB191

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

MS JR1

MS House of Representatives; revise composition of Districts 16, 22, 36, 39 and 41.

MD SJ2

Legislative Districting Plan of 2022